Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine - Yahoo! News"Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some calling the photo offensive and disgusting.
"'I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine,' one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a free magazine that caters to young mothers. 'I was offended and it made my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee table.'Um...hello? If you were offended, why did you leave it on the coffe table and not, say, mince it up into little bits and shove it down your garbage disposal? Moron!
"Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it."Because he's never seen HER breasts, and she doesn't want him getting any funny ideas!
"The picture in Babytalk was aimed at illustrating the controversy surrounding breastfeeding in the United States, where a national survey by the American Dietetic Association found that 57 percent of those polled are opposed to women breastfeeding in public and 72 percent think it is inappropriate to show a woman breastfeeding on television programs.
"There is a real puritanical streak in America," Moran told AFP. "You see celebrities practically baring their breasts all the time and no one seems to mind in this sort of sexual context.
"But in this very natural context of feeding your child, a lot of Americans are very uncomfortable with it."This is so dead-on. Now, I would rather not have to watch a woman breastfeed a baby, but you know, it doesn't
offend me. I think it should be done discreetly if possible--you know, not like while you're paying for your groceries or chatting it up with a coworker. I'm not saying breastfeeding mothers need to hide. I'm just saying, have some class about it.
Which, you know, most of them must, because I cannot remember the last time I saw someone breastfeeding in public. (Or private, for that matter.)
But seriously. It's okay for
Stuff,
Maxim,
FHM, or just about any other "men's magazine" on the newsstand to have pictures of women with so little on, they may as well be naked and spread-eagle--but it's not okay to show a picture of a baby breast-feeding
on the cover of a magazine about babies?
So this is saying...it's okay to show boobie when it's in the context of "Men, wouldn't you like to grope it?" But not in the context of motherhood and natural bodily functions. Thank you, patriarchal maddona/whore complex. You rule.